%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
\chapter{Conclusion}
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------



\section{Development}
The development utilizing the Web Speech API in Javascript is easy to learn,
well documented, feature full and intuitive.


\section{Unresolved problems and possible op\-ti\-mi\-za\-tions}

\subsection{Browsers}
Since only one Browser out of the tested supports the Web Speech API it is not
usable yet for real world applications. Even though the Browser that supports
the API is gaining more and more market share for at least the last year.
Furthermore even the given implementation in Google's Chrome Browser is not
stable enough for productive usage because of the mentioned stability issues
that occur regularly after an average usage of approximately 15 minutes.

\subsection{Speech processing}
Although the quality of the speech recognition is very high it does not
recognize every given input correctly. Therefore it should be improved.
Furthermore the speech synthesis should be improved regarding punctuation and
pauses when given long input or several sentences.



\section{Suggestions and conclusions}
It has been shown that natural human language processing support in modern web
Browsers is almost working. Even though it is not yet ready for productive usage
because of the shown quality, stability and Browser support issues it is
already working for testing purposes. Resolving the shown issues could lead to
completely new, interesting and innovative ways humans could interact with web
applications entirely written in HTML.


